Perhaps Nietzsche was not read correctly by Anglo-American bureaucrats, though if you're correct that Nietzschean ethics is similar to Platonism, then it'd be hilarious ironic given how Nietzsche saw Plato as his primary adversary. I don't think, however, that his view that all facts are interpretations is "objectively undeniable" given how it's objectively self-contradictory. It's just another way of saying "There is no such thing as truth."
What that is a reference to is the breeding of a higher man through selective breeding / eugenics. Many Anglo academics have a poor interpretation of Nietzsche but yours is pretty bad as well. Nietzsche is explicitly a worldly philosopher and criticizes the other worldlyness of philosophers like Plato.
Perhaps Nietzsche was not read correctly by Anglo-American bureaucrats, though if you're correct that Nietzschean ethics is similar to Platonism, then it'd be hilarious ironic given how Nietzsche saw Plato as his primary adversary. I don't think, however, that his view that all facts are interpretations is "objectively undeniable" given how it's objectively self-contradictory. It's just another way of saying "There is no such thing as truth."
What that is a reference to is the breeding of a higher man through selective breeding / eugenics. Many Anglo academics have a poor interpretation of Nietzsche but yours is pretty bad as well. Nietzsche is explicitly a worldly philosopher and criticizes the other worldlyness of philosophers like Plato.
I have a bad interpretation of Nietzsche? Where have I misrepresented him?
It is explained in my comment and is a response to another commentator, not to you.